New Louisiana Law Sparks Debate: Should Schools Display the Ten Commandments?

In a bold move that has stirred controversy nationwide, Louisiana has become the first state to mandate the display of the Ten Commandments in all public school classrooms. This decision, signed into law by Governor Jeff Landry, has sparked a heated debate over the separation of church and state.

Historical Significance vs. Constitutional Concerns

Proponents of the new law argue that the Ten Commandments hold profound historical and cultural significance in shaping America’s legal and moral framework. They point to the commandments’ influence on laws and values since the nation’s founding, citing their presence in iconic American institutions like the Supreme Court and the Library of Congress.

On the other hand, critics, including civil liberty groups, contend that such displays violate the constitutional principle of separation between church and state. They argue that public schools should remain neutral grounds, free from religious influence, to respect the diverse beliefs of students and uphold constitutional integrity.

Legal Battles on the Horizon

Almost immediately after Governor Landry signed the bill, several civil liberty organizations vowed to challenge it in court. They argue that mandatory displays of religious texts in public schools coerce students into religious observance, thus infringing upon their constitutional rights. The outcome of these legal battles could set a precedent for similar measures in other states considering similar legislation.

Supporters’ Perspective

Supporters of the law, such as Harris Faulkner on Fox News, emphasize that the Ten Commandments are more than just religious doctrine; they are foundational to American legal history. They argue that understanding these principles is crucial for students’ moral education and awareness of American heritage. Moreover, they highlight that the displays will be funded entirely by private donations, ensuring no taxpayer money is used to implement the mandate.

Practical Concerns and Public Reaction

Critics, including Emily Compagno and Kayleigh McEnany, raised practical concerns about the mandate’s implementation amidst broader educational challenges in Louisiana. With the state ranking near the bottom in education metrics, they question whether prioritizing religious displays addresses fundamental educational needs, such as improving academic performance and reducing teen pregnancy rates.

The Legal Framework and Constitutional Interpretation

The debate hinges on the interpretation of the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment, which prohibits the government from establishing an official religion. Supporters argue that historical context and non-coercive presentation mitigate any constitutional concerns. They cite examples where similar displays have been upheld in certain historical contexts without constituting state endorsement of religion.

Final Thoughts

As Louisiana moves forward with its initiative to display the Ten Commandments in public schools, the nation watches closely. The outcome of legal challenges and public opinion will shape the future of religious expression in public education across America. What are your thoughts on this contentious issue? Should the Ten Commandments be allowed in schools, or does it cross the line of separation between church and state? Share your opinions in the comments below.



  1. Avatar photoDavid McAfee Reply

    School where you learn the Foundational Skills used in life. What better place for Foundational Rules to live your life by.

  2. Avatar photorick Reply

    “civil liberty groups, contend that such displays violate the constitutional principle of separation between church and state.”

    This alleged “constitutional principle of separation between church and state” is totally bogus and false. The Constitution has no such clause. The phrase comes from a letter written by Thomas Jefferson to a pastor. The pastor was afraid the new federal government might infringe on religious practices of the day, which included religious influence on government. Jefferson used the phrase to assure the pastor that there was a ‘wall of separation’ of state from church, but NOT of church from state. That is, the government cannot infringe on the church, but churches CAN have influence on government. Thus, government CANNOT do things like promote one religion over another or outlaw display of the Ten Commandments, while churches CAN do things like display the Commandments in government settings such as legislative chambers, courtrooms, and public schools.

    As usual, the left is trying to turn the law upside down in order to, in the words of Obama, “fundamentally transform America.”

  3. Avatar photoThomas Reply

    Leave the United States ???????? constitution in its original form respected we must. The people demand it.

  4. Avatar photoMountain man Reply

    I think if schools and painted on crosswalks stuff like that “shame flag “ then everyone has the same rights because the shame deal is abnormal…believing in God is not

  5. Avatar photoKay Brown Reply

    Thank God for stepping in. Why do people think they can abandon God and he not abandon us! America was once a nation under God we could be proud to display him and teach our children to worship him. Now we have let a few people push to take him out of USA. It’s time for Christians to stand up and say no more of this and fight for our God given rights.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *