Customise Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorised as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyse the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customised advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyse the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

Vivek Ramaswamy, appointed by Trump, calls out Biden for rushing subsidies.

Vivek Ramaswamy Slams Biden Admin for “Highly Inappropriate” $50 Billion Chip Subsidies Push Ahead of Transition of Power

In a recent interview with Politico, Commerce Secretary Gina Raimondo revealed her plan to speed up the CHIPS and Science Act, allocating $50 billion in chipmaking subsidies before President-elect Donald Trump assumes office in January. This has raised red flags for Republican nominee and former President Trump’s appointee to lead the Department of Government Efficiency, Vivek Ramaswamy.

On social media platform X, previously known as Twitter, Ramaswamy shared the Politico interview, criticizing the Biden administration for accelerating spending ahead of the transition of power. He also revealed plans for the DOGE, led by himself and Elon Musk, to closely scrutinize each contract issued under the CHIPS Act and other fiscal endeavors from the Biden era, such as the Inflation Reduction Act.

Ramaswamy is not the only one concerned about this hasty allocation of funds. In the interview, Raimondo herself stated that she intends to obligate nearly all of the designated funds before Jan. 20. This rush to spend billions of taxpayer dollars has raised questions about the appropriateness and transparency of the process.

Furthermore, it is worth noting that before the awards from the Biden team, only one contract of $123 million had been granted to a single company. This sudden increase in contracts and funds being handed out in the 11th hour is highly suspicious and warrants further investigation. Ramaswamy has urged inspectors general to closely scrutinize these last-minute contracts and ensure that taxpayer money is being spent wisely.

It is clear that the main priority for the Biden administration is to push through their agenda before the transition of power. This reckless behavior shows a lack of concern for the American people and their hard-earned money. As Ramaswamy aptly put it, these subsidies are “highly inappropriate” and should not be rushed through in such a hasty manner.

The DOGE plan, led by Ramaswamy and Elon Musk, is focused on reducing unnecessary regulations and spending. Ramaswamy has also proposed that federal employees return to full-time office work, a move that would save taxpayer money and increase the efficiency of government operations.

In the wake of these concerning developments, it is clear that the Biden administration’s actions should be closely monitored. Ramaswamy and the DOGE will continue to advocate for transparency and accountability in government spending, and it is crucial that we support their efforts to protect taxpayer dollars.

Share

5 Comments

  1. RRRoger Reply

    Why do the Democrats name their programs the opposite of what they really are?
    Are they such compulsive liars that they cannot help themselves?

    It is time for the truth and transparency.

  2. Michael D Reply

    If a company named things as bad as the dems do the board of directors would be jailed and the company would be fined into bankruptcy. California ballot propositions are a good example.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *