Customise Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorised as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyse the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customised advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyse the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

Supreme Court Stops Sky-High Biden Judge’s $2 Billion Demand!

In a significant intervention, Chief Justice John Roberts has temporarily stopped a controversial ruling from Judge Amir Ali, appointed by the Biden administration, which had demanded the Trump administration pay $2 billion in foreign contracts by an unprecedented midnight deadline. Judge Ali’s order, described by Trump’s Department of Justice as “intrusive and profoundly erroneous,” sought to push the administration into a corner without allowing any room for a reasonable review or process.

The Supreme Court acted swiftly in response to an emergency appeal filed by the Trump administration, underscoring the urgency and irregularity of Judge Ali’s order. “IT IS ORDERED that the February 25, 2025 orders of the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, case Nos. 1:25-cv-00400 and 1:25-cv-00402, are hereby stayed pending further order of the undersigned or of the Court,” Chief Justice Roberts stated, adding critical immediate relief to a situation that was edging toward bureaucratic chaos.

The Acting Solicitor General for the Trump administration articulated strong opposition to Judge Ali’s mandates, arguing, “Neither the original TRO nor the district court’s subsequent clarifications in any way suggested that the government must pay particular invoices on particular dates.” This point underscores the abrupt nature of the court’s deadline, which appeared ill-conceived and disconnected from actual contractual timelines or usual governmental processes.

In their appeal, the DOJ contended the lower court had “lacked any jurisdiction even to issue this order dictating contractual payments by a date certain to remedy purported contractual breaches.” This further highlights the overreach and lack of judicial prudence displayed in attempting to enforce such an order on the Trump administration unnecessarily.

The Trump administration’s legal team expressed frustration over the district court’s actions, noting that “the court’s 11:59 p.m. 30-some-hour deadline thus moved all the goalposts. It is not tailored to any actual payment deadlines associated with respondents’ invoices or drawdown requests, or anyone else’s. And it has thrown what should be an orderly review by the government into chaos.” Such sentiment encapsulates the chaos and disorder injected into an otherwise standard evaluative process due to what appears to be a politically motivated judicial move.

Knowing the appeal dynamics and the principles of governance and justice, this stay represents more than a mere administrative decision. It is a statement against overreach and abuse of judicial directives misaligned with fundamental legal procedures. The ongoing legal dispute continues to highlight the political headwinds faced by the Trump administration, amidst judicial actions seen by some as lacking basis and defaulting to partisan motivations.

Share

2 Comments

  1. Sue Reply

    Why aren’t these smart ass judges that keep putting up roadblocks against a sitting president that have no legal business to interfere not being removed from the bench immediately. Thousand of these schmucks in all these states it’s not hard to find some corrupt scumbags to sign a TRO for the democrats. If their running is over turned by the supreme courts they should be fired and or heavily fined hundred thousand dollars personally this will keep these wannabe judges in there place in backwoods courts. These judges think they have more power than a sitting president and that’s federal obstruction so start impeaching these assholes and prosecute them. Start arresting them immediately

  2. Bret Reply

    So the billions of dollars being sent to foreign countries and entities that was never decided by Congress , but by the hired help in committees and departments can be ordered to continue by the judicial branch. Yea Doubt it. Pretty narcissistic from a Democratic Party judge who is supposed to adhere the constitution

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *