Customise Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorised as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyse the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customised advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyse the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

WATCH! Trump Says Gabbard Was Wrong—Then She Backs Him Anyway

In a major shift that sent shockwaves through Washington’s foreign policy circles, Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard publicly acknowledged this week that Iran could have a nuclear weapon within weeks—directly aligning with President Trump’s warning and contradicting her earlier congressional testimony.

Gabbard’s revised statement doesn’t just vindicate Trump. It confirms what many in the conservative movement have long suspected: the U.S. intelligence community has been downplaying the threat, and Trump saw it coming before anyone else dared to admit it.

Gabbard Clarifies: Yes, Iran Could Go Nuclear Fast

Just two hours after Trump told reporters that Gabbard was “wrong” to cast doubt on his repeated claim that Iran was on the brink of nuclear capability, Gabbard released a carefully worded statement on X. She accused the media of taking her March testimony “out of context” and confirmed that if Iran chose to reassemble its nuclear program, it could produce a weapon in “weeks to months.”

Trump on Tulsi: she’s wrong

This is no small shift. Back in March, Gabbard had stated unequivocally in front of Congress that “Iran is not building a nuclear weapon” and that Supreme Leader Khamenei had not reauthorized the weapons program suspended in 2003. It was a message that comforted diplomats—but now, clearly, no longer reflects the reality on the ground.

By Friday, Gabbard was not only clarifying, but reinforcing Trump’s message: Iran’s uranium stockpile is at unprecedented levels, and the taboo surrounding nuclear weapons discussion in Iran has eroded. In simple terms—they’re not building a bomb yet, but all the pieces are in place, and the decision could happen at any moment.

Trump’s Trust in Gabbard Remains

Despite publicly stating she was “wrong,” Trump has shown no signs of distancing himself from Tulsi Gabbard. Quite the opposite.

Trump appointed Gabbard as Director of National Intelligence for a reason: she’s independent, sharp, and unafraid to challenge the D.C. status quo. Even when their public messaging seems misaligned, their strategic vision remains united—a deep concern for American national security, and an insistence that the threat from Iran is real and imminent.

Gabbard’s clarification proves what Trump knew all along: the threat from Iran is no longer hypothetical.

The Intelligence Community Plays Catch-Up

This isn’t the first time Trump has called out the intelligence apparatus for lagging behind the facts.

Remember the “lab leak theory”? The southern border crisis? The weaponization of the DOJ? Trump sounded the alarm long before the bureaucrats caught up.

Now, with Iran, he’s done it again. While the official line in March was caution and delay, the reality is that Iran’s breakout time—how fast it could produce a nuclear weapon—is now measured in weeks, not years. Gabbard’s own words confirm it: the stockpile is there, the rhetoric in Tehran has shifted, and the infrastructure remains intact.

Fordow and the B61-11: The Strike No One Wants to Talk About

According to U.S. and Israeli defense sources, Iran’s Fordow enrichment facility—located near Qom—is now so fortified that only a strategic nuclear earth-penetrator like the B61-11 could destroy it.

This is the unspoken reality behind the headlines. As Pentagon officials reportedly told AP, conventional bombs won’t cut it anymore. Iran built Fordow to withstand everything short of a full-scale nuclear strike. That leaves few options if the regime decides to cross the nuclear threshold.

Gabbard’s intel confirmation brings this question to the forefront: What happens next?

Is the Biden administration prepared to act, or is it counting on Israel to do the dirty work?

Trump’s Warnings Are America’s Last Line of Defense

When President Trump speaks bluntly about a threat, the media sneers, the bureaucracy shrugs, and the Left mocks him.

Then, weeks—or months—later, the so-called “experts” quietly adjust their talking points, retroactively claiming they were concerned all along. That’s the pattern. That’s the game.

With Iran, the stakes are higher than ever. This isn’t about Twitter feuds or campaign slogans. This is about a terror state sitting on a mountain of enriched uranium, flirting openly with the idea of building a bomb.

Trump saw it. He said it. And now his own DNI confirms it.

Share

2 Comments

  1. Just Me Reply

    “Biden Administration”!!??
    THAT whole group of traitors should be expunged from the American archives!
    About as do nothing and destructive as the FIRST 2 Hussien traitorous regimes!
    3 terms of The American Garage Sale!
    THIS is the Trump Administration!
    Save America First, THEN the world!

  2. Tony Mac Reply

    More ignorant, lazy and just generally crappy reporting by a “trained journalist”. Maybe you should write this down: every underground facility has the exact same weakness, an entrance tunnel. Drop it, and continue to drop it, killing everyone inside and killing everyone trying to dig it out, from the inside and the outside. A simple BLU-109 runway crater bomb can take out the thinner area around the entrance tunnel. A nuclear B-61 is not the option of first choice anyway, the GBU-57A/B MOP is a 30,000-pound “bunker buster” bomb used by the US Air Force. It is designed to penetrate and destroy well-protected targets, such as weapons of mass destruction facilities, and can be carried by B-52, B-2 and B-21 bombers. Drop one, then drop the second into the crater created by the first.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *