Taylor Swift has a voice—there’s no denying that. But her influence should stay in the recording studio and concert venues, not in the political sphere. Swift’s recent endorsement of Kamala Harris proves just how out of touch she is with everyday Americans. She might be an icon in the world of pop music, but when it comes to politics, she’s just another celebrity who thinks their fame automatically translates into wisdom. Spoiler alert: it doesn’t.
A recent poll conducted by YouGov makes it painfully clear that Swift’s star power doesn’t extend to politics. Only 8% of voters said that her endorsement made them “somewhat” or “much more likely” to support Harris. Meanwhile, a significant 20% of those surveyed said that her endorsement actually made them less likely to vote for the vice president. If that’s not a sign of overreach, I don’t know what is.
This brings us to an important point—why does Taylor Swift, or any celebrity for that matter, think they have the authority to influence political decisions? Their fans may adore them for their talent, but that doesn’t mean they should look to them for guidance on who should run the country. Swift should stick to what she knows best—writing songs about her ex-boyfriends—and leave politics to the professionals.
Celebrity Endorsements Don’t Hold Weight
Swift’s endorsement isn’t just ineffective—it’s a perfect example of why celebrity opinions on politics are largely irrelevant. Sure, she’s wildly popular among her 284 million Instagram followers, and yes, she managed to get 10.4 million likes on her post supporting Harris after a debate. But that popularity isn’t transferring to political influence.
Let’s look at the numbers. Even with Swift’s massive social media push, 66% of voters said that her endorsement didn’t matter at all when it came to deciding who they’d vote for. Her post may have generated buzz and drove traffic to vote.gov, but it didn’t sway minds where it mattered—at the ballot box.
If you need more proof, history tells us the same story. Celebrities have been dipping their toes into politics for years, and while there are a few success stories—like Oprah Winfrey helping Barack Obama—most attempts fall flat. A 2010 study from North Carolina State University found that celebrity endorsements from A-listers like George Clooney and Angelina Jolie did little to change voters’ opinions. So what makes Taylor Swift think she can do any better?
Taylor Swift Isn’t Speaking for Everyday Americans
The truth is, Taylor Swift isn’t speaking for everyday Americans. She’s speaking for a narrow, elite audience of followers who already align with her worldview. Her endorsement of Kamala Harris wasn’t about moving the needle—it was about virtue signaling to her progressive fanbase. Swift’s political foray shows just how disconnected she is from the realities most people face in their day-to-day lives.
When Swift throws her support behind Harris, she’s essentially preaching to the choir. The vast majority of Americans don’t live in the bubble of Hollywood glamour and wealth. They don’t have the luxury of time or money to champion causes from an ivory tower. They’re working hard, raising families, and trying to make ends meet in an increasingly uncertain economy. Swift’s political commentary does nothing to speak to those concerns.
What does she know about economic struggles? About the needs of small businesses and middle-class families? Absolutely nothing. When she posts to her massive social media following, it’s nothing more than another out-of-touch celebrity lecturing people on issues she doesn’t understand.
Kamala Harris Should Be Worried, Not Celebrating
Swift’s endorsement may have gotten headlines, but Kamala Harris should be worried about the fallout. With 20% of voters saying they’re less likely to support Harris after Swift’s announcement, it’s clear this move could backfire. The Harris campaign didn’t even know Swift would be making the post—they found out after the fact. That says it all. If Swift’s political voice was really going to help Harris, her campaign would have been in the loop.
Instead, Harris’s team is now stuck with a celebrity endorsement that is alienating voters rather than bringing them together. Sure, they’d love to have Swift appear at rallies in swing states like Pennsylvania, but based on the poll numbers, they might want to reconsider. Swift’s influence could do more harm than good.
Fame Doesn’t Equal Political Savvy
Let’s get one thing straight: just because you’re famous doesn’t mean you’re politically savvy. Swift has an undeniable gift for music, but that doesn’t translate to expertise in government, policy, or leadership. So why should anyone take her seriously when she endorses a candidate?
In today’s world, celebrities seem to think their platform gives them the right to lecture the public on complex issues like healthcare, foreign policy, and the economy. But in reality, most of them are completely out of their depth. Swift’s foray into politics is just another example of this phenomenon, and it’s becoming increasingly frustrating to see.
Think about it—would you trust your plumber to give you advice on your retirement portfolio? Of course not. So why trust a pop singer with zero political experience to tell you who to vote for?
Stick to What You Know, Taylor
At the end of the day, Taylor Swift needs to stick to what she knows—making music. She’s undoubtedly one of the biggest stars in the world, and her fans love her for her catchy tunes and relatable lyrics. But that’s where her influence should end.
Swift’s attempts to step into the political ring only show how out of touch she is with the real world. Her celebrity status has clearly gone to her head, making her think that her opinion on politics is just as valuable as her music. Spoiler alert—it’s not.
If Taylor Swift really wants to make a difference, she should stick to what she’s good at. She can write songs that resonate with her fans, perform sold-out shows, and enjoy her massive platform. But when it comes to politics, she should leave the heavy lifting to those who know what they’re doing.
Final Thoughts
Taylor Swift’s endorsement of Kamala Harris shows just how far celebrities will go to push their agenda, even when it’s clear they’re out of their depth. While Swift might think her star power can influence the political landscape, the numbers tell a different story. Her endorsement backfired, making voters less likely to support Harris. It’s time for Taylor Swift to recognize that fame doesn’t equal political expertise. She should stick to singing and leave the politics to the pros.
WE’D LOVE TO HEAR YOUR THOUGHTS! PLEASE COMMENT BELOW.
JIMMY
Taylor like many other people are very talented in one field but when they open their mouths to speak on other subjects, their igroance is in full bloom.
What platform is Swift running on didn’t know she was a politician.
As predicted this is blowing up in her face. She doesn’t care-she has more money than she knows what to do with. She should’ve just encouraged her fans to register to vote and leave it at that. Nothing more needs to be said. Since she opened her mouth she should be expecting to have more of her concerts cancelled.
It is SO nice to know whom she supports for President. Should she be reporting a non-cash in-kind donation to that campaign? Maybe not, since it did not seen to influence too many.
The first paragraph in this article says it all!
Thanks Sue!