With President Joe Biden now officially out of the 2024 race, Kamala Harris is looking like the Democratic Party’s top pick. This is not just a minor shift—it’s a seismic. Kamala Harris, who is currently the odds-on favorite for the Democratic nomination, is anything but a qualified candidate for president. Her track record, combined with her bizarre statements and contradictions, makes it clear why she’s unfit for the job.
The Bizarre Line: “Imagine What Can Be, Unburdened by What Has Been”
One of Kamala Harris’s favorite lines is: “Imagine what can be, unburdened by what has been.” It sounds like something she came up with while she was high, trying to be profound . Let’s be real—this line just stupid. It’s the kind of vague, philosophical mumbo-jumbo that’s supposed to impress people but actually reveals a lot about her lack of substance.
Harris’s attempt at sounding deep is nothing more than a poorly executed attempt to cover up her glaring unfitness for office. If this is the level of thoughtfulness we can expect from a potential president, it’s no wonder that her candidacy is so concerning.
The Marijuana Contradiction: A Case of Hypocrisy
Kamala Harris’s record on marijuana is a prime example of her hypocrisy. In a recent interview, she reminisced about her college days, claiming she used to smoke marijuana while listening to Snoop Dogg and Tupac. But here’s where it gets interesting—or rather, ridiculous. Harris graduated from college in 1986, went to graduate school, and finished in 1989. She passed the bar in 1990.
The problem? Snoop Dogg’s Doggy Style came out in 1993, and Tupac’s 2Pacalypse Now was released in 1991. So, how could Harris have been enjoying these albums while high if they weren’t even released yet? This inconsistency isn’t just a minor slip-up; it shows a deeper issue with Harris’s credibility. If she can’t keep her stories straight, how can we trust her with the presidency?
A Record of Failures and Controversies
Kamala Harris’s issues extend beyond her contradictory marijuana stories. Her career is marked by a series of failures and controversial decisions. As Attorney General of California, she was responsible for prosecuting thousands of people for drug offenses, including marijuana possession—the same drug she now admits to using herself. This blatant hypocrisy is hard to ignore.
Her record includes supporting harsh bail policies and fighting against efforts to reduce the prison population. Her office was criticized for mishandling cases involving wrongful convictions. As Vice President, Harris was given the responsibility of addressing the root causes of migration, but her performance has been nothing short of disastrous. The border crisis remains a chaotic mess under her watch.
The Terrifying Prospect of a Harris Presidency
With Biden out of the race, the fact that Kamala Harris is the leading candidate for the Democratic nomination is truly frightening. Her lack of a coherent narrative, combined with her controversial record and inconsistent statements, makes her a deeply unqualified candidate for the presidency.
If her past actions and statements are any indication, Harris lacks the judgment, integrity, and leadership skills required to lead this country. Her constant contradictions and failures in office highlight why she should not be trusted with the highest position in the land.
Final Thoughts
Kamala Harris’s bizarre statements, hypocrisy, and questionable record are not just minor issues—they’re major red flags. As the possibility of her becoming president becomes more real, it’s crucial to recognize these glaring problems. Harris’s qualifications—or lack thereof—should be a serious concern for every American.
What are your thoughts on Kamala Harris’s qualifications for the presidency? Share your opinions in the comment section below!
Ask the x mayor of San Francisco that she worked for.
He knows what she is qualified to do.
Her comment” of imagine” what could is a dire warning of what leftists want to do.
This article made some excellent points! Her past is not squeaky clean. A her performance these past four years has not been encouraging. But we should not let all this to Harris distract us from the issues we need to deal with, ie, the economy, inflation, border security, ets.
Camel-face Harris is just another one one of those disastrous DEI picks. Chosen in 2020 and recently now only because her sex, skin color and how obedient she is to the abortion industry.
Any one want to bet that she only going to play the race and sex cards to try to get into the White House?
I think Biden appointment her to be in charge of the border and I’ve never heard that she ever
went down there. We don’t need a person in the presidents office that wont’ do their job. WE’ve
already had enough of it.
Dems who want to run for POTUS in 2028 are not running for the DEM nomination in 2024. The Dems are allowing Harris to run to give some face- and name-recognition to their 2028 candidates, to hopefully save the Dems running down-ballot in 2024 even if Trump wins, and to get in some more attacks against the GOP with a bigger audience than Harris usually attracts. Harris doesn’t have a chance to defeat the Trump/Vance ticket—too much negative political baggage plus she comes across like an unqualified idiot when she speaks. She will be running on abortion, Trump is a dictator, and save democracy by voting Dem. IMO she will do very poorly November 5, 2024.
Probe her DA past for CA alone
& wants to attack Trump personally
Typical MORONIC; MALEVOLENT; and MARXIST myrmidon!
The Biden/Harris administration has been a curse on the American people. We now have a chance to lift that curse. Harris , or any democrat President. would only perpetuate our current situation.
“Moreover thou shalt provide out of all the people able MEN, such as fear God, MEN of truth, hating covetousness; and place such over them, to be rulers….” (Exodus 18:21)
“As for my people, children are their oppressors, and women rule over them. O my people, they which lead thee cause thee to err, and destroy the way of thy paths.” (Isaiah 3:12)
“But I suffer not a woman to … to usurp authority over the man….” (1 Timothy 2:12)
This is not to say that the men in positions of civil leadership are any more biblically qualified than are today’s women – they’re not.
You can thank Article 6’s Christian test ban (by which mandatory biblical qualifications were likewise eliminated) on both counts.
For more regarding Article 6’s Christian test ban, see Chapter 9 “Article 6: The Supreme Law of the Land” of free online book “Bible Law vs. the United States Constitution: The Christian Perspective” at bible versus constitution dot org. Click on the top entry on our Online Book page and scroll down to Chapter 9.
Then Chapter 28 “Amendment 19: The Curse of Women’s Suffrage.”