In recent comments by Jen Psaki, former White House Press Secretary and current MSNBC host, a clear strategy emerges on how President Biden’s team is managing his public appearances amid growing concerns about his age and cognitive abilities. Psaki suggests that President Biden should prioritize engaging with friendly media platforms like The View to communicate with the American people. This approach, while seemingly benign, raises significant questions about the President’s capacity to handle the rigorous demands of his office.
The Strategy of Selectivity
During her appearance on The View, Psaki pointed out that today’s media environment offers many choices. She advocated for President Biden to appear on platforms where the atmosphere is controlled and the audience is more forgiving. This strategy is not just about reaching a broader audience; it’s about carefully crafting the President’s image in a way that minimizes risks and maximizes control.
This selective approach to media appearances is a tactic to shield the President from more challenging environments where tough questions about his fitness for office and policy decisions might be posed. The comparison to past presidents, who have taken a more open stance with the media, is stark. President Reagan, for example, while also facing concerns about his age during his presidency, maintained a more robust engagement with the press.
The Role of Friendly Media
The choice of The View as a suggested platform is particularly telling. While the show is known for its lively discussions and claims to provide a balanced perspective, there is an underlying bias that cannot be ignored. The hosts are often less supportive of Biden himself then they are driven by an intense opposition to former President Trump, often referred to as “Trump Derangement Syndrome.” Whoopi Goldberg, one of the co-hosts, has even gone to the extent of refusing to say Trump’s name on the show. This hostility towards Trump overshadows any genuine support for Biden, suggesting that the primary reason for their backing is not admiration for Biden’s policies but rather a profound opposition to his predecessor.
This scenario creates a protective bubble for Biden, where he can expect not to be challenged aggressively, as the hosts are more united by their disdain for Trump than their support for Biden. Psaki’s proposal seems to imply that such settings would not only protect Biden from potential gaffes but also help in smoothing over any confusion or lapses in communication that might reinforce concerns about his cognitive health.
This orchestration is designed to prevent any narrative that might question Biden’s effectiveness or mental fitness from gaining ground.
The Implications of Shielding
This cautious approach to media engagement has significant implications. First, it restricts the public’s ability to assess the President’s capacity to govern, especially in unscripted situations that more accurately reflect the pressures of the presidency. Second, it feeds into criticisms that the President is merely a figurehead, manipulated by his handlers who are eager to maintain their influence without exposing the potential vulnerabilities of their leader.
Moreover, the strategy of limiting exposure to controlled environments raises concerns about transparency and accountability. It suggests a presidency that is more about image management than about direct, open engagement with the American populace on critical issues.
Final Thoughts
As the Biden administration continues to navigate the complex landscape of media and public perception, the strategy of selective engagement raises more questions than it answers. While it might provide short-term protection for the President, it also perpetuates a narrative of concealment and manipulation. For a role as critical as the presidency, the American people expect and deserve a leader who can stand up to the rigor of the office and communicate openly, not one who is shielded by strategic media appearances. This approach not only undermines the essence of democratic engagement but also erodes the foundational trust that should exist between the American people and their elected leader.
If only THE VIEW would “hide in plain sight”.
As gaff-master Biden continues to entertain the world with his mis-speaks and stupidity, I’m buying my pop corn EARLY for the debate with PRESIDENT TRUMP.
“Psaki suggests that President Biden should prioritize engaging with friendly media platforms like The View”
LMFAO…. will The View host the debate between PRESIDENT TRUMP and that other guy??