Let’s be real for a moment—Hillary Clinton is back at it again, pushing for censorship under the guise of “content moderation” on social media platforms. She recently advocated for the repeal of Section 230, the law that protects social media companies from being held liable for the content users post. Sounds pretty innocent, right? Wrong. What Hillary is really pushing for is a complete stranglehold on free speech—especially conservative voices that dare to challenge her far-left agenda.
What “Moderate Speech” Really Means: Silence Conservatives
When Hillary says platforms need to “moderate speech,” what she’s really saying is “censor conservatives.” Let’s not kid ourselves here. In her world, it’s perfectly acceptable for liberals to spout lies and propaganda all day long, calling conservatives every name in the book, spreading baseless accusations, and promoting their anti-American nonsense. That’s just “free speech” to her. But the moment a conservative dares to tell the truth about liberal hypocrisy, corruption, or the left’s constant assault on our freedoms, suddenly it’s “misinformation” that needs to be silenced.
In Hillary’s twisted reality, who decides what’s true or false? That’s right, the liberal media or some Orwellian “truth board” filled with far-left ideologues who wouldn’t know the truth if it slapped them in the face. Imagine a world where these people get to decide what’s allowed on the internet. Spoiler alert: We’re already inching closer to that nightmare.
Section 230: The Shield Against Liberal Overreach
Hillary’s call to repeal Section 230 is nothing more than a thinly veiled attempt to crush platforms like X (formerly Twitter) and Facebook from allowing any conservative viewpoints. Right now, these platforms are shielded from being held responsible for what users post. It’s a law that has allowed free speech to flourish online, even when Big Tech’s liberal overlords want to clamp down on dissenting voices. But with Hillary’s plan, that freedom would evaporate, and platforms would be forced to either block conservative content entirely or face lawsuits.
You think cancel culture is bad now? Just wait until Hillary and her ilk get their hands on this kind of power. The censorship of conservative speech will go into overdrive, with left-wing mobs cheering every time another voice gets silenced. This isn’t just unconstitutional—it’s frightening.
What’s at Stake: The First Amendment Under Siege
Let’s talk about the Constitution for a minute—specifically, the First Amendment. It was written to protect free speech, not just for people we agree with but for everyone. But Hillary Clinton doesn’t care about that. She’s perfectly fine trampling over the First Amendment if it means silencing her critics and forcing her far-left ideology down America’s throat.
She wants to take away your ability to speak freely, but it gets worse. If Kamala Harris somehow wins the presidency and the Democrats keep control of Congress, we could be looking at a nightmare scenario where this push for censorship becomes law. We’d have the White House, the House, and the Senate all under the thumb of people who hate free speech. That’s not just ridiculous—it’s dangerous.
Hillary Clinton’s Hypocrisy Knows No Bounds
The hypocrisy here is staggering. Hillary Clinton, who spent her entire political career lying to the American people, now wants to control what we can say and read online. This is the same woman who once called half of Trump’s supporters “deplorables” and has shown nothing but disdain for anyone who doesn’t toe the liberal line. Yet she expects us to trust her and her liberal cronies to be the arbiters of truth? Give me a break.
It’s classic Clinton: rules for thee but not for me. Liberals can spread all the misinformation they want about conservatives, but when we speak the truth about their failures, corruption, and radical policies, suddenly it’s “dangerous” speech that needs to be censored.
The Real Goal: Complete Control Over the Narrative
Make no mistake—Hillary’s endgame here isn’t just about social media regulation. It’s about total control over the narrative. She and her fellow liberals know they can’t win in the arena of ideas, so they resort to silencing opposition instead. By controlling what can and cannot be said online, they hope to shut down any dissent and keep the American people in the dark about their true agenda.
They want us to believe that conservative speech is dangerous, that speaking out against the left’s radical policies is harmful to democracy. But the real threat to democracy is their obsession with silencing anyone who doesn’t fall in line. They want to control what you see, what you hear, and ultimately, what you believe.
Final Thoughts: Stand Up for Free Speech Before It’s Too Late
Hillary Clinton’s call for more social media censorship is a dangerous, unconstitutional attack on free speech. It’s not just about moderating harmful content—it’s about silencing conservative voices and controlling the flow of information. And if Kamala Harris and the Democrats get their way, we could be looking at a future where free speech is nothing but a distant memory.
We must stand up and fight for our First Amendment rights before it’s too late. This isn’t just about social media—it’s about the very foundation of our democracy. If we allow the left to take control of the internet, they’ll take control of the entire narrative, and free speech will be dead in America.
WE’D LOVE TO HEAR YOUR THOUGHTS! PLEASE COMMENT BELOW.
JIMMY
Find more articles like this at steadfastandloyal.com.
Screw you Hillary Clinton. I’d rather be deplorable than live in my parent’s basement when I’m 40.
I agree it should be closed for Clinton who’s another trashy, lying witch.
We demand censorship of Clinton. Her and anything about her.
“…R.J. Rushdoony pointed out the sophistry of governments based upon freedom:
‘….[A] society which makes freedom its primary goal will lose it, because it has made, not responsibility, but freedom from responsibility, its purpose. When freedom is the basic emphasis, it is not responsible speech which is fostered but irresponsible speech. If freedom of press is absolutized, libel will be defended finally as a privilege of freedom, and if free speech is absolutized, slander finally becomes a right. Religious liberty becomes a triumph of irreligion. Tyranny and anarchy take over. Freedom of speech, press, and religion all give way to controls, totalitarian controls. The goal must be God’s law-order, in which alone is true liberty.’5
“True liberty is found only in Yahweh’s perfect law of liberty:
‘But whoso looketh into the perfect law of liberty, and continueth therein, he being not a forgetful hearer, but a doer of the work, this man shall be blessed in his deed.’ (James 1:25)6
“James was not describing some New Covenant law that freed us to do whatever we wish. That kind of freedom is nothing more than baptized humanism, which eventually leads to anarchism, one of the quickest paths to legal slavery. Instead, James described the same perfect law of liberty – Yahweh’s commandments, statutes, and judgments – as did King David:
‘So shall I keep thy law continually for ever and ever. And I will walk at liberty….’ (Psalm 119:44-45)….”
Liberty was officially lost in America when the 1787 cadre of Enlightenment and Masonic theistic rationalists (aka constitutional framers and founding fathers) made liberty a goal (almost a God as in France) instead of corollary of implementing the Bible’s perfect law of liberty (Psalm 19:7-11, 119:44-45, James 2:12, etc.) as the law of the land.
For more, see Chapter 11 “Amendment 11: Government-Sanctioned Polytheism” of free online book “Bible Law vs. the United States Constitution: The Christian Perspective” at bible versus constitution dot org. Click on the top entry on our Online Book page and scroll down to Chapter 11.
A fitting end for the Hildabeast: Joe Blow is hunting (deer) with a bolt action rifle about 3 miles from her rally (poorly attended). He inproperly shoots uphill at a deer without a proper background. The bullet makes a high arc and on the downward trajectory strikes the Hildabeast in the head. She does not die instantly but only lives long enough to hear plants in the audiance telling her to go to HEdouble hockey sticks.
Put this filth were she belongs prison, with obama, pelosi, schumer, schiff, nadler, romney, cheney, mcconell, and others all belong in prison 20-life, real prison no special treatment
Democrats like Hillary are constantly attacking the Constitution and particularly our freedom of speech under the first amendment. They are determined to control the narrative and shut dom any opposition.
Have you noticed, that the Dem-o-rats like Hillary, John Kerry, Biden, etc, push for censorship up front and behind the scenes?!
AND, here’s another piece of 💩, irrelevant, washed up filthy ass bitch putting that ugly wrinkled up mug on tv, spewing her lying one sided crap with that smug look on her face, all while knowing the felonies that Comey, the then director of the FBI, let her get away with. Got away with selling 20% of our uranium reserves to Iran and now they have nuclear weapons. This is one nasty bitch that really needs a jail cell. It’s un fathomable the illegal sh!t that the Clinton’s got away with, and continues to get away with everyday. So that pos thinks that she is entitled or still relevant. If she only knew what people really think about her. Oh, just for 💩s and giggles, I don’t blame Bill for dipping that Monica girl. Imagine waking up and looking hilary in the face!!! Holy 💩!!!!.