CBS Breaks Own Rules: Fact-Checks Vance, Still Loses!

Another debate, another round of blatant media bias. This time, JD Vance took the stage and, despite the moderators doing everything they could to stack the deck against him, delivered a performance that left his opponent, Tim Walz, looking nervous, cornered, and dishonest. It was supposed to be a fair fight—CBS even promised no live fact-checking—but when did they ever keep their word? They broke their own rules, proving yet again how deep the media is in bed with the left.

Vance Against the World

It was clear from the start that this was never going to be a fair fight. CBS moderators Norah O’Donnell and Margaret Brennan made it painfully obvious that their mission was to paint Vance as some sort of villain, and Walz as the unchallenged hero. But despite their best efforts, Vance stood tall and dismantled their narrative. When Vance brought up illegal immigration in Springfield, Ohio—an issue that has rightfully outraged many Ohioans—Margaret Brennan couldn’t help herself. She jumped in with a smug, condescending tone, claiming that many Haitian migrants have legal status.

Excuse me? This is supposed to be a debate between two candidates, but instead, it felt like Margaret was out there, tag-teaming with Walz, trying to make Vance look like a liar. Disgusting.

Media Bias Exposed: Moderators Broke Their Own Rule

Let’s not forget: CBS made a promise. They said they wouldn’t do live fact-checking. They said they wouldn’t interfere. But what did they do? They broke their own rule! The very fact that Margaret felt the need to correct Vance in the middle of his point is proof that they never had any intention of playing fair. It’s no secret that the media loves to play referee when a conservative dares to speak the truth, and that’s exactly what happened here.

And as if that wasn’t enough, Norah O’Donnell had the audacity to claim there was no widespread fraud in the 2020 election. Seriously? Is anyone even buying this anymore?

Walz: Nervous and Dishonest

Then there’s Tim Walz, who was clearly out of his depth from the get-go. While Vance was confident, composed, and ready to expose the issues that matter, Walz stumbled through his answers like a man who knew he had the moderators in his back pocket. But even that didn’t save him. You could see it in his eyes—he was terrified of actually facing Vance head-on. And why wouldn’t he be? His record, filled with lies and failures, was laid bare, and no amount of media coddling could hide that.

Walz is a career politician—one who’s been cozying up to the elites for years. But when he came face-to-face with someone who wasn’t afraid to tell the truth, he faltered. His responses were weak, often resorting to half-truths and outright lies to justify his failed policies. But Vance didn’t let him off the hook. He pressed Walz on every issue, from immigration to the economy, making it clear to anyone watching that Walz wasn’t ready for prime time.

Vance Outclassed Everyone

Despite being ganged up on, JD Vance emerged the clear winner. His points on illegal immigration, economic recovery, and the disastrous policies coming from the left resonated with the audience. While the moderators and Walz tried to paint him as out of touch, Vance’s arguments cut through the noise. He didn’t just win the debate—he dominated it.

Walz may have had the moderators in his corner, but it didn’t matter. Vance’s performance was simply too strong. His calm, collected demeanor in the face of such obvious bias only further proved that he is the leader this country needs. Walz, on the other hand, left the debate looking small, dishonest, and unprepared.

Final Thoughts

It’s no surprise that the media, once again, tried to tilt the scales in favor of the left. They’ve been doing it for years, and this debate was no exception. But this time, they underestimated JD Vance. Despite the moderators’ attempts to undercut him, Vance emerged as the clear victor, while Walz—nervous, dishonest, and out of his league—fumbled every opportunity.

The lesson here is simple: no matter how hard the media tries to protect their own, the truth will always come out. And JD Vance? He’s got the truth on his side.

WE’D LOVE TO HEAR YOUR THOUGHTS! PLEASE COMMENT BELOW.

JIMMY

Find more articles like this at steadfastandloyal.com.

Share

15 Comments

  1. Crotte Reply

    CBS like the rest of the MSM has no ethics, no integrity and zero morals. They are paid prostitues for the DEI/DNC Biden/Harris government adn are lining up to do the same for the Harris /Walz incompetents.

  2. Bob M. Reply

    Walz is an embarrassment. He and Harris are socialists, not Democrats. Trump is about to win, MSNBC, CNN, ABC all know he is, and the crazy liberals haven’t started their whining yet.

  3. Helen Reply

    CBS lied to the public. They fact checked Vance 3 times and didn’t fact check Walz even once. These 2 moderators are disgraceful and evil-especially Margaret Brennan-shame on her!! They will most likely keep their jobs unfortunately. I don’t watch CBS, NBC, ABC, CNN, MSNBC, etc. They are all dishonest and spread lies.
    The good thing is that Vance prevailed and did a great job and I would say he won the debate. Walz is a pathological liar-mental health issues-and incompetent. Still can’t believe that he’s a governor.

  4. Ted R. Weiland Reply

    BEWARE THE TRAP!

    “[T]hey measuring themselves by themselves, and comparing themselves among themselves, are not wise.” (2 Corinthians 10:12)

    To measure one biblically unqualified candidate as opposed to another biblically unqualified candidate is, at best, foolish.

    The only standard by which all candidates should be measured is by the Bible’s immutable/unchanging moral law, especially its mandatory biblical qualifications.

    But the constitutional framers fixed it so that will never occur when, in Article 6, they banned Christian tests and thereby mandatory biblical qualifications for civil leaders.

    America’s consequently known nothing but nincompoops, scoundrels, incompetents, immoral reprobates, and outright criminals for her civil leaders ever since.

    And nothing is going to change about this until Christians and patriots become courageous enough to stop participating in the corrupt government and its unbiblical election process and, in turn, begin promoting the Bible’s government of, by, and for God and, in turn, His moral law as supreme.

    There is absolutely no biblical justification whatsoever for unbiblically voting for a biblically unqualified candidate into an unbiblical position of civil leadership, who, if elected, will swear to uphold the biblically seditious Constitution as the law of the land!

    For evidence that the Constitution is biblically seditious, see free online book “Bible Law vs. the United States Constitution: The Christian Perspective,” in which every Article and Amendment is examined by the Bible, at bible versus constitution dot org. Click on the top entry on our Online Book page.

    For more, regarding Article 6’s Christian test ban, see Chapter 9 “Article 6: The Supreme Law of the Land.

    Find out how much you really know about the Constitution as compared to the Bible. Take our 10-question Constitution Survey in the sidebar and receive a free copy of the 85-page “Primer” of “BL vs. USC.”

  5. Robert Richey Reply

    I can’t figure out why any Real American would ever agree to a debate using the deplorable media as moderators. Our news media is worse than anything Hitler ever ruled over.

  6. michael Reply

    The fix was in again with these 2 biased self opinionated ” moderators ” hoping to give that ” clown Walz ” a helping hand , but it backfired.
    He revealed himself again as a liar and unfit for high office —- he and Harris are a good fit . As an Aussie , I watched this debate with interest , where it was obvious to me that Vance shone through as an intelligent contender , knowing the facts and appeared presidential ,

  7. mary Reply

    if there IS another debate, it should be on FOX news with Republican moderators. They had their way twice, so if they want another debate, it should be on OUR terms this time,

  8. Roland Reply

    The problem we have is that they closed the insane asylums. And recruited all of the residents and all of the nuts that should be in these institutions and made them the member base of the Democratic party. The communists (spelled Democrat) have no problem manipulating these mentally deficient morons since their party
    has no morals or ethics.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *