Customise Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorised as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyse the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customised advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyse the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

Piers Morgan Destroys Woke Reparations Argument – Find Out How! [Video]

In a recent televised discussion, Piers Morgan, a well-known media personality, took on what many see as the absurdity of “woke” ideologies, focusing specifically on the topic of reparations. This debate highlighted not only the divides in our society but also the shaky ground upon which these ideologies stand.

Piers Morgan FLIPS Race Card on Woke Activist

Morgan Takes on Reparations

During the segment, Piers Morgan challenged the idea that individuals today should be financially liable for historical actions they had no part in. He posed a direct question: “How much money do you want from me for something that had nothing to do with me?” This question strikes at the heart of the reparations debate. Why should today’s generations pay for the actions of those long gone?

The response from the activist didn’t address Morgan’s fundamental concern but rather continued to push a broad, vague demand for financial compensation. This kind of dialogue shows how conversations about reparations often miss the mark. They don’t address the logistics or the fairness of implementing such a policy.

The Financial Implications

Let’s talk numbers. The activist mentioned figures in the trillions, quoting a national commission on reparations that had evaluated the economic impact of historical injustices. But here’s the question — where would this enormous sum come from? Taxpayers’ pockets. This approach not only seems impractical but also places an unfair burden on people who have no connection to those past actions.

Cultural and Social Impacts

During the debate, there was also talk about cultural pride and the existence of historical symbols and statues. The activist argued that British pride should not diminish her pride as a Black person. This argument opens a significant can of worms about how a society balances its history with the diverse experiences of its people. While it’s essential to respect all community members, erasing history is not the answer.

Pride vs. Practicality

The discussion about pride brings up another point: How does feeling pride translate into practical solutions for today’s problems? Morgan highlighted this by questioning if meeting the demands of the so-called grievance groups would actually resolve the issues they claim to address. His point was clear: Simply throwing money at the problem won’t change historical facts or heal old wounds.

The Problem with “Woke” Agendas

The term “woke” often comes up in discussions about social justice and race. But in this debate, as Morgan pointed out, the “woke” agenda seems less about solving problems and more about perpetuating a cycle of grievance. This is not constructive. It does not lead to real change but rather fosters a permanent state of dissatisfaction and division.

Final Thoughts

The discussion between Piers Morgan and the activist underscores a critical issue with the current “woke” ideologies — they are not grounded in practicality or reality. As Morgan adeptly pointed out, addressing past wrongs is important, but it must be done in a way that is fair and reasonable to all members of society, not just a select few. This debate serves as a reminder that while history should not be forgotten, it should also not be used as a weapon to divide and conquer. It’s time for sensible solutions, not reparations that don’t address the root problems or help us move forward together.

Share

2 Comments

  1. CharlieSeattle Reply

    Reparations ……..Now!
    One way tickets to Africa!

    Losing 13% of the population will cut the US crime rate in half easily!

  2. Helen Sustachek Reply

    What about all the people who are descendants of all those who fought to free the slaves and died or who just fought. Shouldn’t they be considered? Look at all the Civil War cemeteries. Count the tombstones. Why should their descendants have to pay? Subtract one million dollars for every tomb stone from what is wanted in reparation. Let’s see how much reparation money is left. This is not any more unreasonable than what they are demanding. Don’t know if you will get this.
    Helen

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *