North Carolina Supreme Court Race Hinges on 65,000 Suspicious Ballots

North Carolina Court Puts 65,000 Ballots on the Line—And the Left Is Screaming

In a move that should have every American who still believes in election integrity standing and cheering, a North Carolina appeals court just ruled that more than 65,000 ballots in the state’s Supreme Court race may not count—unless voters can prove they are who they say they are.

Seems simple enough, right? Not if you’re a Democrat.

Let’s get one thing straight: this isn’t about voter suppression. This is about basic verification. It’s about maintaining a voting system that’s not wide open to fraud, manipulation, or just plain incompetence. And frankly, it’s about time someone did something about it.

The Court Ruled—and the Left Lost Its Mind

The case centers on Republican Judge Jefferson Griffin, who initially led incumbent Democrat Justice Allison Riggs by about 10,000 votes on election night. But over the following nine days, surprise!—ballots trickled in and flipped the result, handing Riggs a 734-vote lead.

We’ve seen this story before. An election is called. A Republican is up. Then, like magic, votes start appearing out of nowhere—conveniently favoring the Democrat just enough to eke out a win. Sound familiar? Arizona. Georgia. Pennsylvania. And now, North Carolina.

Griffin challenged over 60,000 of those ballots, claiming the voters had not submitted the required ID at the time of registration—either a driver’s license number or the last four digits of their Social Security number. The court agreed.

In a 2-1 ruling, the court found that these votes were in clear violation of state law. The decision laid it out plainly: allowing unlawful ballots to be counted dilutes the votes of lawful citizens. That’s not democracy. That’s electoral theft.

The System Was Rigged from the Start

But here’s the kicker: the court didn’t just call out the voters. It called out the state.

The North Carolina State Board of Elections—run by Democrats—failed to inform voters that they needed to provide proper identification during registration. Instead of fixing it, they fast-tracked the certification of the election and tried to sweep the issue under the rug.

The court stopped that dead in its tracks and said the quiet part out loud: this was the Board’s fault.

That’s what happens when election officials prioritize partisanship over procedure. And now they’re scrambling, because their sloppiness is finally facing consequences.

The ruling gives in-state voters 15 business days to correct their defective registrations or be excluded from the final vote count. In other words, they still have a chance—but only if they follow the rules.

Imagine that. An election where the rules actually matter.

Illegal Votes, Overseas Votes, and… People Who’ve Never Lived in the State?

Griffin also challenged about 5,500 ballots from overseas voters who failed to include ID. Same deal. The court ruled those votes are also invalid unless corrected within 15 business days.

But the most egregious discovery? A group of 267 so-called “never resided” voters—people who have literally never lived in North Carolina but were somehow allowed to vote in a North Carolina election.

You read that right. According to the court, “these purported voters are not eligible to vote in North Carolina non-federal elections, and the votes cast by these purported voters are not to be included in the final count in the 2024 election.”

How does something like that even happen? Who’s approving ballots for people who’ve never stepped foot in the state? And why is it always in close races where Democrats need a last-minute miracle?

The Left is quick to cry voter suppression anytime someone dares to ask for voter ID or clean voter rolls. But what we’re seeing here isn’t suppression—it’s accountability. And they hate it.

A Preview of 2024 and Beyond

Let’s be clear: this is about more than just one state Supreme Court race. This is about restoring trust in a broken system.

If Griffin’s challenge succeeds, it will shift the outcome of the last undecided statewide race from the 2024 election. It may also send a shockwave across the country heading into 2026—and especially 2028.

And that’s exactly why the Left is panicking.

They know their house of cards depends on a maze of last-minute ballots, mail-in vote dumps, and lax verification. When states like North Carolina decide to enforce basic rules, it threatens their entire strategy.

Now, Riggs may appeal the decision. But with the state Supreme Court dominated by Republicans 5-1 (with Riggs recused), her odds aren’t great. Unless they find another 800 ballots in someone’s trunk, this may be game over.

Final Thoughts

What’s happening in North Carolina is a microcosm of a much bigger battle: the war for election integrity. The Left calls it voter suppression. We call it the rule of law.

The fact that 65,000+ ballots were in question, many from voters who never submitted proper ID—or never even lived in the state—is not just troubling. It’s proof that the system is being gamed. And the only way to stop it is by fighting back, one courtroom at a time.

The court did the right thing. Now it’s up to the voters to pay attention.

WE’D LOVE TO HEAR YOUR THOUGHTS! PLEASE COMMENT BELOW.
JIMMY

Find more articles like this at steadfastandloyal.com