The 2024 vice presidential debate was nothing short of a massacre—politically speaking, of course. JD Vance, with his usual confidence and sharp intellect, made it crystal clear that he was leagues above Tim Walz, who stumbled over himself like a nervous high schooler on a debate team. Walz, clearly out of his league, admitted during the debate that he’s a “knucklehead” for lying about his time in China. And boy, did he prove it!
The ‘Knucklehead’ Moment: Walz’s China Blunder
Walz’s low point came when moderators pressed him about his previously inflated claims of being in China during the Tiananmen Square massacre. Walz has been telling tall tales about being in Hong Kong during the protests, but the truth came out—he wasn’t even in the country until months after the fact. When called out on the discrepancy, Walz sheepishly admitted he “misspoke” and resorted to calling himself a “knucklehead.”
That’s right, folks, even he knew he was out of his depth.
JD Vance: Polished, Prepared, and Presidential
Meanwhile, JD Vance came to play. Unlike Walz, who seemed to be reciting rehearsed lines, Vance was a master of the moment. His confidence in tackling tough issues like immigration, health care, and the economy was undeniable. Walz, on the other hand, nervously fumbled, struggling to keep up with the pace Vance set.
On immigration, Walz couldn’t hide behind his party’s failed policies. Vance, on the other hand, laid out the dire consequences of the Biden-Harris administration’s open-border disaster, making it clear that Kamala Harris has done more damage to American security than any VP in recent memory. And let’s not forget Vance’s powerful stance on health care—something Walz couldn’t even come close to rebutting.
MSNBC’s Delusion: Defending the Indefensible
You’d think after such a thorough shellacking, the left would acknowledge the obvious. But no—cue MSNBC’s Rachel Maddow and her fellow echo chamber elites, who had the audacity to claim Walz somehow came out on top. Maddow and company are so out of touch with reality, they’ll grasp at any straws to make Walz look competent. Their desperate attempt to praise Walz for his “policy knowledge” is as delusional as it gets.
It’s almost laughable that they tried to spin Walz’s bumbling performance as a win. Were we watching the same debate? Walz barely made it through without tripping over his own talking points, while Vance remained cool, calm, and collected, answering every question with authority.
The ‘Knucklehead’ in Over His Head
What stood out most in this debate was how uncomfortable and over-prepared Walz seemed. He spent the night trying to regurgitate memorized lines instead of responding in real time. Every time Vance pressed him on critical issues, Walz came up short. The difference in their approaches was stark: Vance was genuine, while Walz was clearly performing for the cameras, desperately trying to keep his composure.
When asked about his own running mate, Vice President Kamala Harris, Walz fumbled yet again. He tried to defend her record, but there was no enthusiasm behind his words. Even Walz seemed to know that defending Harris was a losing battle.
Final Thoughts: Vance for the Win
In the end, JD Vance delivered a decisive victory. His calm demeanor and clear grasp of the issues made him the obvious choice for voters seeking real leadership. Walz? He might want to focus more on being honest about his past before attempting to tackle the issues facing America.
For anyone still doubting the result of this debate, just remember: when a candidate calls himself a “knucklehead” on stage, there’s not much else left to say.
WE’D LOVE TO HEAR YOUR THOUGHTS! PLEASE COMMENT BELOW.
JIMMY
Find more articles like this at steadfastandloyal.com.
The debate totally went to Vance.It was really aparent that he knew what he was talkung about,not like his oppointnut who had to look at his notes (cheat sheet) part of the time.
The best thing, probably the only thing good about A-Walz, is he is from the state where the criminal George Floyd is still dead. If he loves teaching so much, go back to it and let the adults have a shot at running this country.
Maddow and MSNBC are out of touch with the Debate..
If your still unsure of who to Vote for seek God for answers..
What they Failed to comment on was the Border and the Millions of people that came here from many different Countries and IGNORED Our Immigrations Law’s
Vance not only did a better presentation than Walz, he was better than either Harris or Trump were in their debate.
Bravo Vance, damn CBS censors
BEWARE THE TRAP!
“[T]hey measuring themselves by themselves, and comparing themselves among themselves, are not wise.” (2 Corinthians 10:12)
To measure one biblically unqualified candidate as opposed to another biblically unqualified candidate is, at best, foolish.
The only standard by which all candidates should be measured is by the Bible’s immutable/unchanging moral law, especially its mandatory biblical qualifications.
But the constitutional framers fixed it so that will never occur when, in Article 6, they banned Christian tests and thereby mandatory biblical qualifications for civil leaders.
America’s consequently known nothing but nincompoops, scoundrels, incompetents, immoral reprobates, and outright criminals for her civil leaders ever since.
And nothing is going to change about this until Christians and patriots become courageous enough to stop participating in the corrupt government and its unbiblical election process and, in turn, begin promoting the Bible’s government of, by, and for God and, in turn, His moral law as supreme.
There is absolutely no biblical justification whatsoever for unbiblically voting for a biblically unqualified candidate into an unbiblical position of civil leadership, who, if elected, will swear to uphold the biblically seditious Constitution as the law of the land!
For evidence that the Constitution is biblically seditious, see free online book “Bible Law vs. the United States Constitution: The Christian Perspective,” in which every Article and Amendment is examined by the Bible, at bible versus constitution dot org. Click on the top entry on our Online Book page.
For more, regarding Article 6’s Christian test ban, see Chapter 9 “Article 6: The Supreme Law of the Land.
Find out how much you really know about the Constitution as compared to the Bible. Take our 10-question Constitution Survey in the sidebar and receive a free copy of the 85-page “Primer” of “BL vs. USC.”
A-hole waltz kept bragging about his days as a teacher. He never stated that his curriculum was teaching the race baited CRT crap. Teaching young children to hate the Country that they are brought in. Children are subjected to enough confusion and anxiety in their youth, they don’t need being taught that their home is a place that should be hated and is racist. A younger child doesn’t know what racism even is and shouldn’t be taught that. Would add to even more confusion. Waltz also said that they’re not coming after our guns either. But him and kamelho have both campaigned on gun bans, gov’t buybacks. I’d like to tell her that I have never bought any of my rifles, shotguns or handguns from the government, therefore, the government cannot buy them back. Who do they think they’re trying to shiite? Give up all the body guards, secret service protection, her little gun she carries in her purse, waltz’s shotguns FIRST, Then and Only Then, after they have been out and about in the real world without protection, sees what everyone experiencing everyday, will I listen to her bullshiite about guns. Even then she’s not getting them!
I don’t see any fact check on waltz’s claim to have kids via IVF. Not true, his wife have uterine sperm injections. Maybe waltz has a teeny wee wee or can’t have a stiffy.
Walz & Harris are birds of a feather. They deserve each other. But the nation does not deserve either of them.
Demorats have for many years distorted the truth…oh, lied about being somewhere as in the case of Walzflower being in China during that crucial time and who did admit he misspoke..yeah, Remember Hillary saying she was name after Hillary who climbed Everest in 1953 and climbed the mountain years after she was hatched…or what about Hillabeans saying that her daughter was jogging near the twin towers that fateful morning..and of course not being able to lie about dat “blue dress”…goes with the democratic territory to lie and lie some mo