Say whatever you want about Trey Gowdy but one thing he isn’t is a wallflower. He speaks his mind and some of the things on his mind are not sprinkled with politeness or decorum.
You always know where he stands. Adam Schiff knows where Gowdy stands because it’s right on his neck. Schiff has been on TV , spending hours saying that the evidence of collusion is much stronger than the public knows and that there is more than circumstantial evidence that President Trump colluded with Russia during the 2018 election.
The problem he has is he cannot name one bit of evidence that has not already been in the media and extreme liberals like Diane Feinstein is quick to admit that she has not seen any evidence of collusion.
Gowdy appeared on TV on Sunday and this is what he said:
“Some of my Democratic colleagues, namely Adam Schiff, said he had evidence, more than circumstantial evidence of collusion, before the investigation even began.”
“Almost 60 Democrats voted to move forward with impeachment. Already. Before Bob Mueller’s released a single finding. Before the House Intelligence or Senate Intelligence Committees have released a single, solitary finding, almost 60 House Democrats think the president ought to be removed from office.”
Gowdy is of the belief that Schiff is making up evidence that doesn’t exist because he wants to run for the Senate to take over Feinstein’s seat. That begs the question that if Schiff has all of this evidence, why has he not presented it during this long and tedious investigation that finds that collusion claims are a big fat nothing burger.
There are four Senate committees, a special prosecutor and the FBI who have investigated collusion for up to 18 months without uncovering a single shred of evidence. Investigations that have cost nearly 10 million taxpayer dollars so far.
I hope the voters remember that on election day 2018.