State Department SLAMMED By Judge For Lying To Him – He’ll Make Them Pay!

In a case between Judicial Watch (JW) and the State Department over documents in the Hillary email scandal, the judge has turned hostile against State Department lawyers, after it became obvious that they had lied to him about the availability of those documents.

In a previous hearing, he had okayed limited disclosure and now he says he is glad he did, because it revealed that he had been misinformed. (Polite for lying through their teeth) On top of that, they had the audacity to ask for the case to be thrown out. The judge made it clear that he wouldn’t rule in their favor.

From Fox News

U.S. District Court Judge Royce Lamberth said he was “shocked” and “dumbfounded” when he learned that FBI had granted immunity to former Clinton chief of staff Cheryl Millsduring its investigation into the use of Clinton’s server, according to a court transcript of his remarks.

“I had myself found that Cheryl Mills had committed perjury and lied under oath in a published opinion I had issued in a Judicial Watch case where I found her unworthy of belief, and I was quite shocked to find out she had been given immunity in — by the Justice Department in the Hillary Clinton email case,” Lamberth said during Friday’s hearing.

The Department of Justice’s Inspector General (IG), Michael Horowitz, noted in a bombshell report in June that it was “inconsistent with typical investigative strategy” for the FBI to allow Mills to sit in during the agency’s interview of Clinton during the email probe, given that classified information traveled through Mills’ personal email account. “[T]here are serious potential ramifications when one witness attends another witness’ interview,” the IG wrote.

The State Department is pulling out all the stops as the Deep State seeks to protect Hillary Clinton from serious prison time. Once Jeff Sessions is gone, I suspect, more documents will be made available and their entire web of lies will fall apart.

The views and opinions expressed here are solely those of the author of the article and not necessarily shared or endorsed by

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse.