Mueller Report Commented on DNC Server They Never Saw…Based on Report From FBI That Didn’t See it Either

There is a giant hole in the Mueller report, something we would expect from Mueller’s pit bull, Andrew Weissmann. It talked about Russia hacking the DNC server. How do they know it was hacked by the Russians?

They got their information from an FBI report, even though the FBI was not allowed to see it either. Why didn’t they have an early morning raid on the DNC so they could physically examine it? You cannot confirm anything based on a report from an entity that never examined the server.

That’s ludicrous.  No real investigation works that way.

From Breitbart News

In his extensive report, Special Counsel Robert S. Mueller notes that his investigative team did not “obtain or examine” the servers of the Democratic National Committee (DNC) in determining whether those servers were hacked by Russia.

Instead, Mueller’s assessment of the DNC’s allegedly hacked servers relied upon the investigations conducted by the FBI and other agencies. “The Office understands that the FBI, the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, and the states have separately investigated that activity,” reads Mueller’s report.

However, the DNC famously refused to allow the FBI to access its servers to verify the allegation that Russia carried out a hack during the 2016 presidential campaign. Instead, the DNC reached an arrangement with the FBI in which a third party company, CrowdStrike, conducted forensics on the server and shared details with the FBI.

As this reporter previously documented, CrowdStrike was financed to the tune of $100 million from a funding drive by Google Capital.

Google Capital, which now goes by the name of CapitalG, is an arm of Alphabet Inc., Google’s parent company. Eric Schmidt, the chairman of Alphabet, has been a staunch and active supporter of Hillary Clinton and is a longtime donor to the Democratic Party.


Send this to a friend