GAME CHANGER: Deep State FBI Planted a Spy in Trump Campaign

This is truly a game changer. The FBI planted a spy in the Trump campaign and it’s that spy that the DOJ will not give up any information on.

The House Republicans have found out that during the same time that Barack Obama was spying electronically on candidate Trump, the FBI Deep State had a mole. This is very interesting because if they were listening in on conversations and had someone on the inside and still found no proof of collusion, we can assume a political reason for the Mueller investigation. It is important for us to know exactly when this spy was planted because if it was in or before July 2016, it blows the entire Papadopoulos myth into oblivion.

Democrats and the FBI, along with the DOJ claim their investigation did not center on the Hillary dossier but with a conversation between a CIA mole and George Papadopoulos. The FBI received a meeting with a man with a copy of the Hillary dossier on July 5th, the same day Comey exonerated Hillary Clinton but they didn’t find out about the Papadopoulos conversation until the very end of the month. So if the spy was planted before the beginning of August, that would prove that Comey and McCabe lied about the cause of the investigation.

The pieces are starting to fall into place and every day it looks like from Obama on down, the government was working to assure Hillary’s victory in the 2016 election. The ironic thing is that with all that help, Hillary still got her but kicked so hard she has to unbutton her shirt to do Number 2.

The Wall Street Journal reported:

Thanks to the Washington Post’s unnamed law-enforcement leakers, we know Mr. Nunes’s request deals with a “top secret intelligence source” of the FBI and CIA, who is a U.S. citizen and who was involved in the Russia collusion probe. When government agencies refer to sources, they mean people who appear to be average citizens but use their profession or contacts to spy for the agency. Ergo, we might take this to mean that the FBI secretly had a person on the payroll who used his or her non-FBI credentials to interact in some capacity with the Trump campaign.

This would amount to spying, and it is hugely disconcerting. It would also be a major escalation from the electronic surveillance we already knew about, which was bad enough. Obama political appointees rampantly “unmasked” Trump campaign officials to monitor their conversations, while the FBI played dirty with its surveillance warrant against Carter Page, failing to tell the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court that its supporting information came from the Hillary Clinton campaign. Now we find it may have also been rolling out human intelligence, John Le Carré style, to infiltrate the Trump campaign.