Hillary’s Server Possibly Hacked By Chinese…FBI Covers it Up

Things are starting to get interesting. You may remember a while back Louie Gohmert announced that Hillary’s server was hacked by a country…but not Russia. He never mentioned the name of the country.

There was an anomaly on her server that made copies of emails and sent them to an outside server. That server is owned by a Chinese company. To make things worse is that Peter Strzok and the FBI were made aware of that fact and they did nothing about it.

The Intelligence Community Inspector General (ICIG) found that Clinton’s server was compromised with malware and they met with Peter Strzok and he was briefed on the hacking.

From The Daily Caller

In July 2018, during the committee’s questioning of Strzok, Republican Texas Rep. Louie Gohmert described a meeting in which named members of the ICIG staff met with Strzok. He said they informed Stzrok of “an anomaly they had found on Hillary Clinton’s emails that were going to the private unauthorized server that you were supposed to be investigating.”

“It was going to an unauthorized source that was a foreign entity unrelated to Russia,” Gohmert said.

At the hearing, Strzok acknowledged the meeting but claimed he did not recall qualified fellow government investigators telling him about a massive national security breach that would be a major smoking gun in the case he was working.

“The forensic examination was done by the ICIG, and they can document that,” Gohmert said. “But you were given that information, and you did nothing with it.”

The Clinton email probe was perceived as having a major impact on the 2016 election. Former FBI Director James Comey held a July 2016 press conference in which he acknowledged reckless practices by Clinton but said:

We did not find direct evidence that Secretary Clinton’s personal email domain, in its various configurations since 2009, was successfully hacked. But, given the nature of the system and of the actors potentially involved, we assess that we would be unlikely to see such direct evidence.